A day of mourning, a moment of silence

do not wantWell, I guess it had to happen eventually — greedy Goliath Amazon with its insatiable corporate appetite has bought my beloved Goodreads. Here are some initial thoughts I shared on the site with fellow Goodreaders:

I find this news to be both disheartening and worrisome. Amazon is a financial Goliath and its perpetual lust for supremacy in the book world has crushed many Davids under its boot heels.

The company’s goal to monopolize the ereader market with the Kindle and its proprietary file format is a frustrating, unnecessary barrier to readers as is Amazon’s attempt to monopolize sales exclusively through its site, cutting all other retailers out of the game.

I’m a librarian in Canada who continues to be disappointed with Amazon’s refusal to allow library lending on its devices. While this restriction has been lifted in the US, it continues to be a point of contention in this country. Should library borrowing of ebooks ever be allowed for Kindle devices in Canada, I fear the sheer cost for libraries forced to purchase Amazon’s proprietary file format will result in another stranglehold on the size and diversity of our collection.

I cannot help but conclude that this is not a good day for Goodreads and its millions of users.

I’m not a Kindle user (I’m more a fan of the egalitarian EPUB devices like the NOOK and Kobo) and I do not buy from Amazon because they have pissed me off more than once getting their greedy corporate hands on several books I wanted that suddenly were only retailing through the Amazon store. I *hate* that kind of monopolization. Especially when it comes to books.

Amazon has also been no friend to libraries or independent booksellers, and that pisses me off. I’m also nervous about the fate of my Goodreads reviews and if they are now “owned” by Amazon to do with as they see fit. To alleviate a little of that anxiety, and as a form of protest, I am reviving my little blog in order to have a “safe place” for my reviews to live on if the worst should happen. So over the next little while I will be performing a fair amount of “review dumping”.

I suck at math, but if Goodreads offered its users a paid membership in order to stave off this corporate invasion, I’m sure the majority of the community would have opted for that. What’s 25 dollars times 16 million (+ or – a few million)? Otis, I wish you had come to us first, man. We built this site together. Didn’t you think you owed us anything after all that?

And now I can’t help but wonder…is this the day that Goodreads died?

…and so it begins (the eBook revolution that is)

A few weeks ago I watched Eli Neiburger’s 2 part presentation entitled: Libraries at the Tipping Point – How eBooks Impact Libraries. The thrust of his argument? Libraries are screwed. But are they really?

The jury is still out of course, because none of us has a crystal ball or a time machine that works. We can make our best guesses and depending on whether you are a half-full / half-empty type of person, the future of libraries either looks very bright or very bleak.

I’m quite optimistic actually. This isn’t a zero-sum situation we’re dealing with here (although many alarmists would have us think so). I don’t see eReaders replacing books altogether. We are looking at a delivery system that will serve some needs some of the time, but not all needs all of the time. Will the ratio be 50/50? Probably not. More like 60/40, in favor of digital content. Books will hold their own because they don’t have to be plugged in or recharged, they don’t require any technical know-how or the purchase of any special devices. Digital files become outdated and/or corrupted. Books are a simple, beautiful invention that as a “technology” have proven their worth over and over again. We will not be throwing the baby out with the bathwater. Sure, eReaders are great and will find their niche and flourish, but not to the extent to cause the death of the book. Even when people are downloading eContent, either through legal or illegal means, they still continue to buy books too. As author Neil Gaiman explains online availability of his novels has only increased his print sales, not diminished them.

I see an upside to all this: if the majority of bestsellers are downloaded onto eReaders that leaves more room on the library’s shelves for authors who don’t publish so often, and for books that are harder to find, that may have beautiful covers and even more beautiful stories.

The real threat to libraries aren’t the eBooks themselves, but how publishers decide to move forward. Already there’s been a huge outcry over the recent decision by HarperCollins to enforce a 26 loan cap on eBooks licensed to libraries,  meaning once an eBook is “checked-out” twenty-six times, the  license expires and in order for libraries to continue lending it, they would have to purchase it again, and again, and again (in perpetuity) . For popular materials this could get quite expensive … prohibitively so.

Here’s the thing: public libraries are in a unique position to promote and support reading and publishers should want to be our friends, not try to cut us off at the legs. That just doesn’t make sense, plus it will leave a bad taste in everyone’s mouth, smacking too much of out-and-out greed. Remember Gaiman’s point: if anything, sharing leads to more buying, not less – publishers need to recognize the symbiotic relationship they’ve always shared with libraries, who act as promoters and advertisers. Libraries get us hooked on books, and eBooks are going to help libraries do that even more. Why then are publishers feeling the need to punish an ally like the public library, or the consumer for that matter?

In the digital revolution, no one “owns” anything anymore, so the matter becomes how to fairly and equitably distribute content? If common sense prevails, there is a workable compromise to be reached here.

And it starts with something like this:

The eBook User’s Bill of Rights

Every eBook user should have the following rights:

  • the right to use eBooks under guidelines that favor access over proprietary limitations
  • the right to access eBooks on any technological platform, including the hardware and software the user chooses
  • the right to annotate, quote passages, print, and share eBook content within the spirit of fair use and copyright
  • the right of the first-sale doctrine extended to digital content, allowing the eBook owner the right to retain, archive, share, and re-sell purchased eBooks

I believe in the free market of information and ideas.

I believe that authors, writers, and publishers can flourish when their works are readily available on the widest range of media. I believe that authors, writers, and publishers can thrive when readers are given the maximum amount of freedom to access, annotate, and share with other readers, helping this content find new audiences and markets. I believe that eBook purchasers should enjoy the rights of the first-sale doctrine because eBooks are part of the greater cultural cornerstone of literacy, education, and information access.

Digital Rights Management (DRM), like a tariff, acts as a mechanism to inhibit this free exchange of ideas, literature, and information. Likewise, the current licensing arrangements mean that readers never possess ultimate control over their own personal reading material. These are not acceptable conditions for eBooks.

I am a reader. As a customer, I am entitled to be treated with respect and not as a potential criminal. As a consumer, I am entitled to make my own decisions about the eBooks that I buy or borrow.

I am concerned about the future of access to literature and information in eBooks.  I ask readers, authors, publishers, retailers, librarians, software developers, and device manufacturers to support these eBook users’ rights.

These rights are yours.  Now it is your turn to take a stand.  To help spread the word, copy this entire post, add your own comments, remix it, and distribute it to others.  Blog it, Tweet it (#ebookrights), Facebook it, email it, and post it on a telephone pole.

To the extent possible under law, the person who associated CC0 with this work has waived all copyright and related or neighboring rights to this work

A time to weed

To everything there is a season…
and you can bet there is a time to weed!

If it’s one thing that divides the library profession like nothing else … it’s weeding.  Some librarians will do it with a genetically predisposed glee. For them, weeding is a religion, or at the very least a deep-seated conviction that on the shelf with their Dewey cousins books need room to breathe, that less is always more, that relevancy and currency are the lifeblood of a healthy, vibrant collection…  NOT sheer, unchecked quantity.

Photo from Awful Library Books

The other camp views weeding with suspicion and as a last resort for every book is worth saving, right? — regardless of age, condition, and accuracy. You just never know when someone somewhere (perhaps over the rainbow?) might come looking for it. This group means well and their heart is in the right place … but oh how the road to hell is paved with such good intentions, leaving our stacks choked and over-burdened by outdated, often erroneous material with shabby library bindings (and even offensive odors).

Stop the insanity. A book’s value is rarely limitless nor its lifespan infinite. Even when the content contained within still has something to offer, the binding often deteriorates to the point where the book should be put out of its misery.  Saving particular books from obscurity and preserving them for future generations is the domain of Archives and Museums, and must be surrendered to these institutions willingly, and with respect for what they do. It is not the public library’s job to hold on to every single item ever catalogued and shelved within their collections. It’s ludicrous to think we can, madness to even try.

Photo from Awful Library Books

Space is defined and finite. Shelving obeys the physical law of maximum capacity. But only weeding when space runs out leads to all sorts of trouble … not to mention embarrassing results. Don’t believe me? Take a tour of Awful Library Books, a hilarious (yet sobering) look at just what library staff continue to find on their shelves on a daily basis.

Managing a library collection is serious business — and removing old books is just as important as adding new ones. De-selection is critical. Weeding the out-dated, no longer relevant, crumbling materials is a professional responsibility of paramount importance.

To everything there is a season, and there is a time to weed.

My weeding creed:

1) If it’s falling apart, dirty, and/or smells bad — weed it!

2) If it’s woefully old-fashioned, erroneous and/or no longer relevant — weed it!

3) If it hasn’t been checked out since Adam was a boy, taking up prime real estate yet not pulling its weight — weed it!

4) If you realize you are holding onto something for sentimental reasons rather than professional ones – weed it!

 

 

 

%d bloggers like this: